Loughborough University
Browse
Winder-Bibb-Medical-RP-JOMS-2005.pdf (91.17 kB)

Medical rapid prototyping technologies: state of the art and current limitations for application in oral and maxillofacial surgery

Download (91.17 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2014-04-08, 14:36 authored by John Winder, Richard Bibb
Purpose We describe state of the art software and hardware requirements for the manufacture of high quality medical models manufactured using medical rapid prototyping. The source of the medical model artefacts and there physical appearance are illustrated along with remedies for their removal. Materials and Methods Medical models were built using predominantly stereolithography and fused deposition modelling at both institutions over a period of 6 years. A combined total of 350 models have been produced for a range of maxillofacial, neurosurgical and orthopaedic applications. Stereolithography, fused deposition modelling computerised numerical milling and other technologies are described. Results A range of unwanted artefacts that create distortions on medical models have been identified. These include, data import, CT gantry distortion, metal, motion, surface roughness due to support structure removal or surface modelling and image data thresholding. The source of the artefact has been related to the patient, imaging modality performance or the modelling technology. Discussion as to the significance of the artefacts on clinical use is provided. Conclusions It is recommended that models of human anatomy generated by medical rapid prototyping are subject to rigorous quality assurance at all stages of the manufacturing process. Clinicians should be aware of potential areas for inaccuracies within models and review the source images in cases where model integrity is in doubt.

History

School

  • Design

Citation

WINDER, J. and BIBB, R.J., 2005. Medical rapid prototyping technologies: state of the art and current limitations for application in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 63 (7), pp.1006-1015.

Publisher

© Elsevier

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publication date

2005

Notes

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.03.016

ISSN

0278-2391

eISSN

1531-5053

Language

  • en

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC