Loughborough University
Browse
Potter - Rereading Discourse and social psychology.pdf (3.36 MB)

Re-reading discourse and social psychology: transforming social psychology

Download (3.36 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2014-07-04, 11:56 authored by Jonathan Potter
This paper considers one theme in the contemporary legacy of Potter and Wetherell's (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology. It overviews the context that led to that book and considers a series of critical responses from both experimental and critical/qualitative social psychologists. It refutes criticisms and corrects confusions. Focusing on contemporary discursive psychology, it highlights (a) its rigorous use of records of actual behaviour; (b) its systematic focus on normative practices. In methodological terms, it (a) highlights limitations in the use of open-ended interviews; (b) considers the way naturalistic materials provide access to participants’ own orientations and displays; (c) builds a distinctive logic of sampling and generalization. In theoretical terms, it (a) highlights the way discourse work can identify foundational psychological matters; (b) offers a novel approach to emotion and embodiment; (c) starts to build a matrix of dimensions which are central to the constructing and recognizing of different kinds of social actions. It now offers a fully formed alternative social psychology which coordinates theory and method and a growing body of empirical work.

History

School

  • Social Sciences

Department

  • Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies

Published in

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY

Volume

51

Issue

3

Pages

436 - 455 (20)

Citation

POTTER, J., 2012. Re-reading discourse and social psychology: transforming social psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51 (3), pp. 436 - 455.

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell © The British Psychological Society

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publication date

2012

Notes

This article was published in the journal, British Journal of Social Psychology [© The British Psychological Society] and the definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02085.x

ISSN

0144-6665

Language

  • en