Loughborough University
Browse
Attridge & Inglis ZDM final paper.pdf (350.27 kB)

Increasing cognitive inhibition with a difficult prior task: implications for mathematical thinking

Download (350.27 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2015-04-17, 10:41 authored by Nina Attridge, Matthew InglisMatthew Inglis
Dual-process theories posit two distinct types of cognitive processing: Type 1, which does not use working memory making it fast and automatic, and Type 2, which does use working memory making it slow and effortful. Mathematics often relies on the inhibition of pervasive Type 1 processing to apply new skills or knowledge that require Type 2 processing. In two studies, we demonstrate that giving participants a difficult task (Raven’s Matrices) before a task that requires the inhibition of intuitive responses (the Cognitive Reflection Test) significantly improves performance. Our findings suggest that encountering a difficult task that requires Type 2 processing before completing a task that requires inhibition of Type 1 processing may encourage an enduring ‘Type 2’ mindset, whereby participants are more likely to spontaneously use Type 2 processing for a period of time. Implications for mathematics education are discussed.

History

School

  • Science

Department

  • Mathematics Education Centre

Published in

ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education

Citation

ATTRIDGE, N. and INGLIS, M., 2015. Increasing cognitive inhibition with a difficult prior task: implications for mathematical thinking. ZDM: Mathematics Education, 47(5) pp.723-734.

Publisher

Springer Verlag / © FIZ Karlsruhe

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publisher statement

This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Publication date

2015

Notes

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0656-1

ISSN

1863-9704

Language

  • en

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC