Loughborough University
Browse
NADE2000.pdf (97.26 kB)

The use and evaluation of focus group technique: the undergraduate industrial designer experience

Download (97.26 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2006-07-06, 14:14 authored by Deana McDonagh-Philp, Howard G. Denton, Anne Bruseberg
Focus group techniques have a history in market research and social sciences. Though focus groups have conventionally supported new product development, they are typically organised and run by market researchers who then feed only the essence of the results to the designer. The authors are suggesting that in fact a designer could undertake the role of a moderator or co-moderator at certain stages in the designing process. This paper presents a case study during which the designers themselves (undergraduate Industrial Design students1) have prepared, conducted and analysed a series of focus groups. The study concentrated on the development of an ironing system (i.e. iron, ironing board and steam generator). It provides a context for evaluation and critical analysis of the technique. The paper discusses the technique – its benefits and limitations – as expressed by the undergraduate designers. The authors feel that this technique could be successfully introduced at undergraduate level. Even before this, at A level and GCSE there could be benefits in employing the technique to help pupils and students understand the benefits of gaining insights into the emotive side of product selection. Findings indicate that considerable training was necessary before undergraduates could successfully employ this technique. However, the potential in supporting new product development was demonstrated to be substantial.

History

School

  • Design

Pages

69973 bytes

Citation

MCDONAGH-PHILP, DENTON and BRUSEBERG, 2000. The use and evaluation of focus group technique: the undergraduate industrial designer experience. Journal of the National Association for Design Education, 8, pp. 17-26

Publisher

© National Association of Design Education

Publication date

2000

Notes

This article was published in the professional journal, Journal of the National Association for Design Education [© NADE].

ISSN

1354-408X

Language

  • en

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC