Loughborough University
Browse
On-the-dynamic-response-of-an-instrumented-headform-ACCEPTED-2 revised.pdf (630.3 kB)

On the dynamic response of an instrumented headform for alternative mounting stiffnesses when subjected to ballistic impacts

Download (630.3 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2016-11-16, 14:07 authored by Ben W. Stone, Andy HarlandAndy Harland, James P. Jones, Sean MitchellSean Mitchell, Paul SherrattPaul Sherratt, Craig A. Ranson, Ben Halkon
The current British Standard for head protectors for cricketers has been recently revised to include a projectile-based battery of tests, the intention being to ensure that a certified helmet will also prevent contact of the ball or grille with the specified headform facial region. The purpose of this study was to characterise the dynamic response of the headform to direct ballistic impacts for alternative headform mounting arrangements. On the one hand, and in accordance with the relevant sections of the Standard, what might be described as a “Constrained” set-up was evaluated while, on the other, an arrangement with significantly reduced stiffness, in line with that previously reported for the passive human neck, was subject to equivalent appraisal. For each mounting scenario, an air cannon was used to project a cricket training ball at three speeds toward the instrumented headform at three locations with five repeats per speed/location combination. High rate/resolution video and piezo-electric accelerometer data were collected and processed to determine the headform response. While differences between specific ball impact speed and location scenarios are set out in detail later in the article, overall observations are summarised as follows. From a ball-headform contact duration standpoint, video derived results showed ranges of 1.30 – 1.45ms (Constrained) vs. 1.26 – 1.41ms. Maximum ball deformations the timing of which enabling the event to be subdivided into “loading” and “unloading” phases, were found to be 82.5 – 86.2% (Constrained) vs. 82.8 – 86.4% of original ball diameter, mean peak headform accelerations during loading were found to be 860 – 1615m/s2 (Constrained) vs. 967 – 1638m/s2 while headform speeds at the end of the loading phase were found to be 0.5 – 0.92m/s Constrained) vs. 0.54 – 0.93m/s. Differences between headform response for the two mounting arrangements were observed to be more substantial during the loading rather than unloading phase.

Funding

This research was funded by the International Cricket Council which contributed to the completion of the research described in this article.

History

School

  • Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering

Published in

Proceedings of the IMechE Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology

Volume

231

Issue

4

Pages

324 - 335

Citation

STONE, B.W. ... et al., 2017. On the dynamic response of an instrumented headform for alternative mounting stiffnesses when subjected to ballistic impacts. Proceedings of the IMechE Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 231(4), pp.324-335.

Publisher

Sage (© The Authors)

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publisher statement

This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Publication date

2017-05-05

Notes

This paper was accepted for publication in the journal, Proceedings of the IMechE Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology.

ISSN

1754-3371

eISSN

1754-338X

Language

  • en

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC