Loughborough University
Browse
26139.pdf (2.99 MB)

Experimental study of cognitive aspects affecting human performance in manual assembly

Download (2.99 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2017-08-18, 13:41 authored by Anna Brolin, Peter Thorvald, Keith Case
This full factorial experimental study aimed to investigate different ways of presenting material and information at the workstation while using mixed assembly mode with product variants. The experimental set up annotated an assembly line involving 36 subjects (19 women and 17 men) partly assembling a pedal car. The material presentation factor involved the use of a material rack compared to using an unstructured kit as well as a structured kit. The information presentation factor involved using a text and number instruction compared to a photograph instruction, and situations with and without component variation were considered. Both quantitative and qualitative results were obtained, including time and errors as dependant measures, and workload ratings as well as a questionnaire as support measurements. Among the results it was found that assembly times and workload ratings were lower when using a kit, whereas using a material rack resulted in perceived decreased workflow and increased stress and frustration. Moreover, assembly times and workload ratings were lower when using photographs, whereas using text and numbers increased mental workload. The results could be useful when planning work places and production systems in order to obtain a better workflow and an increased human performance.

History

School

  • Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering

Published in

Production and Manufacturing Research

Volume

5

Issue

1

Pages

141-163

Citation

BROLIN, A., THORVALD, P. and CASE, K., 2017. Experimental study of cognitive aspects affecting human performance in manual assembly. Production and Manufacturing Research, 5 (1), pp.141–163.

Publisher

Taylor & Francis (© the authors)

Version

  • NA (Not Applicable or Unknown)

Publisher statement

This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/

Acceptance date

2017-08-02

Publication date

2017-09-26

Notes

This is the published version of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Production and Manufacturing Research on 26/09/2017, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2017.1374893.

ISSN

2169-3277

Language

  • en