Loughborough University
Browse
[1569206X - Historical Materialism] Contradictions of the Labour Process, Worker Empowerment and Capitalist Inefficiency.pdf (605.45 kB)

Contradictions of the labour process, worker empowerment and capitalist inefficiency

Download (605.45 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-02-26, 09:36 authored by Matt VidalMatt Vidal
I articulate a classical-Marxist theory of technical change in the capitalist labour process, highlighting two contradictions. The management contradiction is the conflict managers experience between coordination (to increase efficiency) and discipline (to ensure valorisation). The workforce contradiction is the tension workers experience between productive socialisation and alienation. I submit that both contradictions were substantially muted from the earliest stages of capitalism through the Fordist stage but have become intensified in the postfordist period. Under postfordism, the basis of efficiency is economies of scope and flexibility, and thus there is a real efficiency advantage to empowering workers, via both multiskilling and employee involvement in problem solving and decision making. Postfordist capitalism has thus initiated an intensification of the management and workforce contradictions. In response, capitalist management is increasingly impeding the growth of the productive forces by failing to empower workers.

History

School

  • Loughborough University London

Published in

Historical Materialism

Volume

28

Issue

2

Pages

170 - 204

Citation

VIDAL, M., 2019. Contradictions of the labour process, worker empowerment and capitalist inefficiency. Historical Materialism, 28 (2), pp.170-204.

Publisher

Brill Academic Publishers

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Rights holder

© Matt Vidal

Publisher statement

This is an open access article. It is published by Brill under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Acceptance date

2019-01-11

Publication date

2019-11-26

Copyright date

2019

ISSN

1465-4466

eISSN

1569-206X

Language

  • en

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC