Loughborough University
Browse
Gale14.pdf (1.51 MB)

Mammography workstation design: effect on mammographer behaviour and the risk of musculoskeletal disorders

Download (1.51 MB)
conference contribution
posted on 2010-06-03, 10:46 authored by Sian Taylor-Phillips, Matthew G. Wallis, Alastair Gale
In the UK Breast Screening Programme there is a growing transition from film to digital mammography, and consequently a change in mammography workstation ergonomics. This paper investigates the effect of the change for radiologists including their comfort, likelihood of developing musculoskeletal disorders (MSD’s), and work practices. Three workstations types were investigated: one with all film mammograms; one with digital mammograms alongside film mammograms from the previous screening round, and one with digital mammograms alongside digitised film mammograms from the previous screening round. Mammographers were video-taped whilst conducting work sessions at each of the workstations. Event based Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) postural analysis showed no overall increase in MSD risk level in the switch from the film to digital workstation. Average number of visual glances at the prior mammograms per case measured by analysis of recorded video footage showed an increase if the prior mammograms were digitised, rather than displayed on a multi-viewer (p<.05). This finding has potential implications for mammographer performance in the transition to digital mammography in the UK.

History

School

  • Science

Department

  • Computer Science

Citation

TAYLOR-PHILLIPS, S., WALLIS, M.G. and GALE, A.G., 2008. Mammography workstation design: effect on mammographer behaviour and the risk of musculoskeletal disorders. IN: Sahiner, B. and Manning, D.J. (eds.). Medical Imaging 2008: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment. Proceedings of SPIE 6917, 69171G.

Publisher

© 2008 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Publication date

2008

Notes

Copyright 2008 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic electronic or print reproduction and distribution, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper are prohibited. This paper can also be found at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.770202

Language

  • en