Loughborough University
Browse
Repository version.pdf (213.39 kB)

Working time and cigarette smoking: evidence from Australia and the United Kingdom

Download (213.39 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2014-05-27, 13:59 authored by Dave Angrave, Andy Charlwood, Mark Wooden
Cigarette smoking is a risk factor in a range of serious diseases, including cardiovascular disease, cancer, stroke and type II diabetes. Theory suggests that working long hours will increase smoking propensities among workers. Consequently there is a significant body of evidence on the relationship between working time and smoking. Results, however, are inconsistent and therefore inconclusive. This paper provides new evidence on how working time affects smoking behaviour using nationally representative panel data from Australia (from 2002 to 2011) and the United Kingdom (from 1992 to 2011). We exploit the panel design of the surveys to look at within-person changes in smoking behaviour over time as working time changes. In contrast to most previous studies, this means we control for time invariant aspects of personality and genetic inheritance that may affect both smoking propensities and choice of working hours. We find that working long hours tends to increase the chances that former smokers will relapse, reduce the chances that smokers will quit and increase cigarette consumption among regular smokers, and that these effects tend to become more pronounced for workers who usually work very long hours (50 or more hours a week) compared to those who work moderately long hours (40-49 hours a week).

History

School

  • Business and Economics

Department

  • Business

Published in

Social Science & Medicine

Volume

112

Pages

72 - 79

Citation

ANGRAVE, D., CHARLWOOD, A. and WOODEN, M., 2014. Working time and cigarette smoking: evidence from Australia and the United Kingdom. Social Science & Medicine, 112, pp.72-79.

Publisher

© Elsevier

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Acceptance date

2014-04-20

Publication date

2014-04-21

Notes

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Social Science & Medicine. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.031

ISSN

0277-9536

Language

  • en

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC