Loughborough University
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Reason: This item is currently closed access.

Brachial artery modifications to blood flow-restricted handgrip training and detraining

journal contribution
posted on 2014-06-23, 13:51 authored by Julie E.A. Hunt, Lucy A. Walton, Richard FergusonRichard Ferguson
Low load resistance training with blood flow restriction (BFR) can increase muscle size and strength, but the implications on the conduit artery are uncertain. We examined the effects of low-load dynamic handgrip training with and without BFR, and detraining, on measures of brachial artery function and structure. Nine male participants (26 ± 4 yr, 178 ± 3 cm, 78 ± 10 kg) completed 4 wk (3 days/wk) of dynamic handgrip training at 40% 1 repetition maximum (1RM). In a counterbalanced manner, one forearm trained under BFR (occlusion cuff at 80 mmHg) and the other under nonrestricted (CON) conditions. Brachial artery function [flow-mediated dilation (FMD)] and structure (diameter) were assessed using Doppler ultrasound. Measurements were made before training (pretraining), after training (posttraining), and after 2-wk no training (detraining). Brachial artery diameter at rest, in response to 5-min ischemia (peak diameter), and ischemic exercise (maximal diameter) increased by 3.0%, 2.4%, and 3.1%, respectively, after BFR training but not after CON. FMD did not change at any time point in either arm. Vascular measures in the BFR arm returned to baseline after 2 wk detraining with no change after CON. The data demonstrate that dynamic low-load handgrip training with BFR induced transient adaptations to conduit artery structure but not function. Copyright © 2012 the American Physiological Society.

History

School

  • Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences

Published in

Journal of Applied Physiology

Volume

112

Issue

6

Pages

956 - 961

Citation

HUNT, J.E.A., WALTON, L.A. and FERGUSON, R.A., 2012. Brachial artery modifications to blood flow-restricted handgrip training and detraining. Journal of Applied Physiology, 112 (6), pp. 956 - 961

Publisher

© American Physiological Society

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publication date

2012

Notes

This article is closed access.

ISSN

8750-7587

eISSN

1522-1601

Language

  • en

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC