Mediatization response.pdf (26.89 kB)
'Mediatization and' or 'Mediatization of'? A response to Hepp et al.
journal contribution
posted on 2015-07-06, 13:56 authored by David DeaconDavid Deacon, James StanyerJames StanyerWe welcome Hepp et al.’s (2015) response to our recent critique of the concept of
‘Mediatization’ (Deacon and Stanyer, 2014), which they also use to showcase new literature
on this topic. Their article demonstrates why further robust debate on this matter is
needed. For when internationally renowned academics start to declare ‘paradigmatic
shifts’, then a much wider community of scholars need to consider whether or not the
earth is moving for them (see Hepp et al., 2015: 314–315, 321).
History
School
- Social Sciences
Department
- Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies
Published in
MEDIA CULTURE & SOCIETYVolume
37Issue
4Pages
655 - 657 (3)Citation
DEACON, D. and STANYER, J., 2015. 'Mediatization and' or 'Mediatization of'? A response to Hepp et al. Media, Culture and Society, 37 (4), pp. 655 - 657.Publisher
SAGE Publications Ltd / © The Author(s)Version
- SMUR (Submitted Manuscript Under Review)
Publisher statement
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Publication date
2015Notes
This item was submitted for publication in the journal, Media, Culture and Society [SAGE Publications Ltd / © The Author(s)]. The definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0163443715580761.ISSN
0163-4437Publisher version
Language
- en