Loughborough University
Browse
Krystallisetal2016CMEpaperrev3 (1).pdf (336.72 kB)

Using BIM to integrate and achieve holistic future-proofing objectives in healthcare projects

Download (336.72 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2016-03-23, 13:29 authored by Ilias Krystallis, Peter DemianPeter Demian, Andrew Price
Future proofing (FP) as a proactive initiative for Asset Management is an urgent need against uncertainty, particularly in healthcare due to unforeseeable demographic shifts and rapid advances in medical technology. Building Information Modelling (BIM) is another initiative with profound impacts, but a rigorous analysis between them will indicate that a synergy exists. The aim of this study is to develop a classification ontology of the interactions between FP and BIM by considering the perceptions of healthcare construction experts. Interviews with 13 senior managers were conducted adopting the method of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) and an interaction matrix of BIM capabilities for implementing holistic FP objectives has been developed. The outcome is a taxonomy analysis of 30 interactions with supporting empirical evidence which were further measured quantitatively. For benefits realisation in the context of BIM and FP, the industry experts recognise FP as a strategy that supports organisational and building performance. BIM drives towards lifecycle operation information and data maintainability via communicating the FP strategy from a whole-life perspective and ensuring knowledge transfer across all stages. Healthcare Operators and construction experts should be able to benefit from this taxonomy analysis as an aid to planning for FP throughout their BIM processes.

History

School

  • Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering

Published in

Construction Management and Economics

Volume

33

Issue

11-12

Pages

890-906

Citation

KRYSTALLIS, I., DEMIAN, P. and PRICE, A.D.F., 2015. Using BIM to integrate and achieve holistic future-proofing objectives in healthcare projects. Construction Management and Economics, 33 (11-12), pp. 890-906.

Publisher

© Taylor & Francis (Routledge)

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publisher statement

This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Acceptance date

2016-03-04

Publication date

2016-05-09

Copyright date

2015

Notes

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Construction Management and Economics on 9th May 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01446193.2016.1164326.

ISSN

0144-6193

eISSN

1466-433X

Language

  • en

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC