Loughborough University
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Reason: This item is currently closed access.

Alarm timing, trust and driver expectation for forward collision warning systems

journal contribution
posted on 2006-07-05, 15:18 authored by Genya Abe, John H. Richardson
In order to improve road safety, automobile manufacturers are now developing Forward Collision Warning Systems (FCWS). However, there has been insufficient consideration of how drivers may respond to FCWS. This driving simulator study focused on alarm timing and its impact on driver response to alarm. The experimental investigation considered driver perception of alarm timings and its influence on trust at three driving speeds (40, 60 and 70 mile/h) and two time headways (1.7 and 2.2 s). The results showed that alarm effectiveness varied in response to driving conditions. Alarm promptness had a greater influence on ratings of trust than improvements in braking performance enabled by the alarm system. Moreover, alarms which were presented after braking actions had been initiated were viewed as late alarms. It is concluded that drivers typically expect alarms to be presented before they initiate braking actions and when this does not happen driver trust in the system is substantially decreased.

History

School

  • Design

Pages

308568 bytes

Citation

ABE, G. and RICHARDSON, J., 2005. Alarm timing, trust and driver expectation for forward collision warning systems. Applied Ergonomics, 37(5), pp. 577-586

Publisher

© Elsevier

Publication date

2005

Notes

This is Restricted Access. This article was published in the journal, Applied Ergonomics [© Elsevier] and is available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00036870.

ISSN

0003-6870

Language

  • en

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC