Chadwick-Why-People-Dual-Screen-Political-Debates-JoBEM-2017-REF Upload.pdf (194.94 kB)
Why people dual screen political debates and why it matters for democratic engagement
journal contribution
posted on 2017-10-20, 14:53 authored by Andrew ChadwickAndrew Chadwick, Ben O'Loughlin, Cristian VaccariDual screening during televised election debates is a new domain in which political elites and journalists seek to influence audience attitudes and behavior. But to what extent do non-elite dual screeners seek to influence others, particularly their social media followers, social media users in general, and even politicians and journalists? And how does this behavior affect short- and longer-term engagement with election campaigns? Using unique, event-based, panel survey data from the main 2015 UK general election debate (Wave 1 = 2,351; Wave 2 = 1,168) we reveal the conditions under which people experience agency, empowerment, and engagement now that social media have reconfigured broadcast political television.
History
School
- Social Sciences
Department
- Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies
Published in
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic MediaVolume
61Issue
2Pages
220 - 239Citation
CHADWICK, A., O'LOUGHLIN, B. and VACCARI, C., 2017. Why people dual screen political debates and why it matters for democratic engagement. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(2), pp. 220-239.Publisher
© Broadcast Education Association. Published by Taylor and FrancisVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publisher statement
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acceptance date
2017-03-23Publication date
2017-05-26Notes
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media on 26 May 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/08838151.2017.1309415.ISSN
0883-8151eISSN
1550-6878Publisher version
Language
- en