Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/10761

Title: Structural model updating and prediction variability using Pareto optimal models
Authors: Christodoulou, Konstantinos
Ntotsios, Evangelos
Papadimitriou, Costas
Panetsos, Panagiotis
Keywords: Model updating
Structural identification
Multi-objective optimization
Pareto optimality
Reliability
Issue Date: 2008
Publisher: © Elsevier
Citation: CHRISTODOULOU, K. ... et al, 2008. Structural model updating and prediction variability using Pareto optimal models. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 198 (1), pp. 138-149.
Abstract: A multi-objective identification method for structural model updating based on modal residuals is presented. The method results in multiple Pareto optimal structural models that are consistent with the experimentally measured modal data and the modal residuals used to measure the discrepancies between the measured and model predicted modal characteristics. These Pareto optimal models are due to uncertainties arising from model and measurement errors. The relation between the multi-objective identification method and the conventional single-objective weighted modal residuals method for model updating is investigated. Using this relation, an optimally weighted modal residuals method is also proposed to rationally select the most preferred model among the alternative multiple Pareto optimal models for further use in structural model prediction studies. Computational issues related to the reliable solution of the resulting multiobjective and single optimization problems are addressed. The model updating methods are compared and their effectiveness is demonstrated using experimental results obtained from a three-story laboratory structure tested at a reference and a mass modified configuration. The variability of the Pareto optimal models and their associated response prediction variability are explored using two structural model classes, a simple 3-DOF model class and a higher fidelity 546-DOF finite element model class. It is demonstrated that the Pareto optimal structural models and the corresponding response and reliability predictions may vary considerably, depending on the fidelity of the model class and the size of measurement errors.
Description: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in the journal Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2008.04.010
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2008.04.010
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/10761
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2008.04.010
http://www.elsevier.com/locate/cma
ISSN: 0045-7825
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Civil and Building Engineering)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
CMA_8654_Final.pdf762.29 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.