Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/11069

Title: Interpretation of water retention field measurements in relation to hysteresis phenomena
Authors: Canone, Davide
Ferraris, Stefano
Sander, Graham C.
Haverkamp, Randel
Keywords: System parameters
Hysteresis
Water retention
Issue Date: 2008
Publisher: © American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Citation: CANONE, D. ... et al., 2008. Interpretation of water retention field measurements in relation to hysteresis phenomena. Water Resources Research, 44, W00D12, 14 pp., doi:10.1029/2008WR007068, [printed 46(4), 2010].
Abstract: Knowledge of the soil water retention function is fundamental to quantifying the flow of water and dissolved contaminants in the vadose zone. This function is usually determined by fitting a particular model (see, for example, van Genuchten (1980) or Brooks-Corey (1964)) to observed retention points. Independent of the model chosen, interpretation and identification of the water retention parameters are subjective and prone to error, particularly as it is common that the hysteresis history in measured data points is unknown. Experimental data sets from three different field soils are used to clearly demonstrate how the lack of hysteresis knowledge can lead to an inconsistent and incorrect interpretation of the retention data, and therefore to the incorrect estimation of soil hydraulic parameters. By using a hysteresis model to interpret this same data set, it is easily shown that consistent and reliable estimates of soil retention parameters can be obtained. This is true for any physically based hysteresis model. The difficulty in reading water retention measurements may be evident when both drying and wetting data are measured. However, in practice, users are rarely aware of this problem since generally only one set of drying data is measured, making comparison impossible. Such erratic interpretation of water retention field data in the literature will be probably far more common than expected.
Description: This article was published in the journal, Water Resources Research [© American Geophysical Union (AGU)] and the definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007068
Version: Published
DOI: 10.1029/2008WR007068
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/11069
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007068
ISSN: 0043-1397
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Civil and Building Engineering)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Canone et al 2008 WRR.pdf797.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.