Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/11114

Title: Who reads the project file? Exploring the power effects of knowledge tools in construction project management
Authors: Sage, Daniel J.
Dainty, Andrew R.J.
Brookes, Naomi
Keywords: Knowledge
Project management
Actor-network theory
Issue Date: 2010
Publisher: © Taylor & Francis (Routledge)
Citation: SAGE, D.J., DAINTY, R.J. and BROOKES, N., 2010. Who reads the project file? Exploring the power effects of knowledge tools in construction project management. Construction Management and Economics, 28 (6), pp. 629 - 639.
Abstract: Various critical authors have questioned the salience, efficacy and power effects of formal project management bodies of knowledge (PMBoKs). As a result project management knowledge tools are increasingly being conceptualized along more flexible, adaptable, reflexive, democratic and informal terms. A central driver for this shift is that PM knowledge will be more relevant and useful for practitioners if it can be reflexively tailored to fit local project scenarios, emergent problems and different communities of practice, rather than projects being structured to fit generic ‘best practice’ ideals. Hence new knowledge tools increasingly would appear critical to alleviate various detrimental power effects associated with bureaucratic knowledge practices within project‐based industries, not least construction. This assumption is examined through a study of a formal and codified project management knowledge tool—a project file—within a small team of project practitioners in a large civil engineering consultancy. Various concepts of power related to actor‐network theory (ANT) are mobilized to understand how non‐human artefacts can enact power and knowledge in nuanced ways within organizations. This theoretically informed study will aid both researchers and practitioners interested in the consequences of developing prescriptive or reflexive project management knowledge within construction contexts and beyond.
Description: This article was published in the journal, Construction Management and Economics [© Taylor & Francis (Routledge)] and the definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01446191003725154
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1080/01446191003725154
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/11114
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01446191003725154
ISSN: 0144-6193
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Who reads the project file.pdf129.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.