Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/11491

Title: European Union support for sanitation in sub-Saharan Africa: aid flows and effectiveness
Authors: Cotton, Andrew P.
Valfrey-Visser, B.
van Maanen, P.
Scott, Rebecca E.
Keywords: Aid effectiveness
Donor support
Financing
Monitoring
Policy
Sanitation
Issue Date: 2012
Publisher: © IWA Publishing
Citation: COTTON, A.P. ... et al., 2012. European Union support for sanitation in sub-Saharan Africa: aid flows and effectiveness. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 2 (3), pp. 190 - 199.
Abstract: Within sub-Saharan Africa, 569 million people, amounting to 69% of the population, do not use improved sanitation. This study presents an overview of European Union (EU) donor support to sanitation in sub-Saharan Africa and proposes a method for investigating the effectiveness of national sanitation programmes through linking aid flows to sanitation outcomes in terms of trends in open defecation; this can be used to locate the relative performance of different countries. The work addresses key concerns of the African Ministers' Council on Water and the European donors around the need to increase support to sanitation. Results show that EU donors are the major source of external finance for sanitation in sub-Saharan Africa. Case studies from Mozambique, Uganda and Burkina Faso show that the majority of national planned expenditure on sanitation comes from donor sources, with EU donors being the substantive contributors. National policies on subsidy for sanitation and expenditure allocations vary extremely widely and do not necessarily align with sanitation outcomes. EU member states' donor policies on sanitation are consistent and well-aligned with those of the African Union; this is a major achievement for Europe and Africa. Inadequate national monitoring of sanitation expenditure remains a constraint to determining programme effectiveness.
Description: The definitive peer-reviewed and edited version of this article is published in the Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development [© IWA Publishing] and is available at www.iwapublishing.com
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.2166/washdev.2012.106
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/11491
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2012.106
ISSN: 2043-9083
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Civil and Building Engineering)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
WASHDEV-D-11-00106R1_text_edited_final.pdf277.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.