Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/11543

Title: Portfolio of control modes in project teams: a Hong Kong case study
Authors: Tuuli, Martin Morgan
Rowlinson, Steve
Koh, Tas Yong
Keywords: Empowerment
Formal control
Hong Kong
Informal control
Portfolio of control
Issue Date: 2009
Publisher: © ARCOM / the authors
Citation: TUULI, M.M., ROWLINSON, S. and KOH, T.Y., 2009. Portfolio of control modes in project teams: a Hong Kong case study. IN: Dainty, A. (ed) Proceedings of the 25th Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2009, Nottingham, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, pp. 927-37.
Abstract: The management of projects through various planning and control tools has been described essentially as rebureaucratisation which increases control over individuals, teams and organisations through ideologies of efficiency and performativity and, thus, aspire a new form of “iron cage” of project rationality. Yet, it has also been argued that certain characteristics of the project setting makes it an ideal environment for the empowerment of individuals and teams. The manifestations of control in project teams are examined through a case study of a Hong Kong public housing development project. Control in this context is viewed broadly as encompassing all devices and systems employed to ensure that acts, behaviours and decisions of individuals, teams and organisations are consistent with meeting organisational or project goals, objectives and strategies. The data was collected through documentary analysis, passive observations and semi-structured face-to-face interviews, and analysed using descriptive methods. The findings indicate that all stakeholders implement a portfolio of control modes comprising both formal (i.e. behaviour-based and outcome-based) and informal (i.e. clan and self) control mechanisms which are not necessarily incompatible. A portfolio of control modes appears necessary because formal modes of control are static in nature and can become redundant in dealing fully with the evolving nature of the project environment in which plans, targets and procedures are often not immutable but fluid and changeable. Controllers design new control mechanisms to help in implementing the formal controls already in place or invoke informal control modes which are more responsive to changing project conditions and particularly appropriate when uncertainty is high, knowledge of the transformation process is imperfect and outputs are immeasurable. The control of projects is therefore not only a function of what formal control mechanisms stakeholders put in place, but what informal control mechanisms those being controlled also put in place to augment the inadequacies of formal control.
Description: This is a conference paper. It is also available at: http://www.arcom.ac.uk/
Version: Published
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/11543
Publisher Link: http://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/proceedings/ar2009-0927-0937_Tuuli_Rowlinson_and_Koh.pdf
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers (Civil and Building Engineering)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Portfolio of control modes in project teams.pdf395.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
PDF-cover.pdf27.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.