Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/11765

Title: UK microgeneration. Part II: technology overviews
Authors: Staffell, Iain
Baker, Philip
Barton, John P.
Bergman, Noam
Blanchard, Richard E.
Brandon, Nigel P.
Brett, Daniel J.L.
Hawkes, Adam
Infield, David
Jardine, Christian N.
Kelly, Nick
Leach, Matthew
Matian, Mardit
Peacock, Andrew D.
Sudtharalingam, Sohasini
Woodman, Bridget
Keywords: Energy conservation
Renewable energy
Issue Date: 2010
Publisher: © ICE Publishing Ltd.
Citation: STAFFELL, I. ... et al., 2010. UK microgeneration. Part II: technology overviews. Proceedings of the ICE - Energy, 163 (4), pp. 143 - 165.
Abstract: This paper reviews the current status of microgeneration technologies at the domestic scale. Overviews are given for nine such technologies, grouped into three sections: (a) low carbon heating: condensing boilers, biomass boilers and room heaters, air source and ground source heat pumps; (b) renewables: solar photovoltaic panels, flat plate and evacuated tube solar thermal panels and micro-wind; and (c) combined heat and power: Stirling engines, internal combustion engines and fuel cells. Reviews of the construction, operation and performance are given for the leading commercial products of each technology. Wherever possible, data are presented from the field, giving the actual prices paid by customers, efficiencies and energy yields experienced in real-world use, reliability and durability, and the problems faced by users. This information has a UK focus but is generally relevant in the international context. Two issues are found to be prevalent throughout the microgeneration industry. Total installed costs are a premium and vary substantially between technologies, between specific products (e.g. different models of solar panel), and between individual installations. Performance in the field is found in many cases to differ widely from manufacturers’ quotes and laboratory studies, often owing to installation and operational problems. Despite this, microgeneration has demonstrated substantial improvements over conventional generation in terms of fossil fuel consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and energy cost, provided that the appropriate technologies are employed, being installed and operated correctly according to the load requirements of the house and their physical location.
Description: This article was published in the Proceedings of the ICE - Energy [© ICE Publishing Ltd.] and the definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/ener.2010.163.4.143
Version: Published
DOI: 10.160/ener.2010.163.4.143
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/11765
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.160/ener.2010.163.4.143
ISSN: 1751-4223
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (CREST)
Published Articles (Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
ener163-143.pdfPublished1.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.