Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/11826

Title: Thinking the ontological politics of managerial and critical performativities: an examination of project failure
Authors: Sage, Daniel
Dainty, Andrew R.J.
Brookes, Naomi
Keywords: Performance
Ontological
Performativity
Critical management studies
Actor-network theories
Projects
Failure
Issue Date: 2013
Publisher: © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Citation: SAGE, D., DAINTY, A. and BROOKES, N., 2013. Thinking the ontological politics of managerial and critical performativities: an examination of project failure. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29 (3), pp. 282–291.
Abstract: Recent contributions within Critical Management Studies have argued for critical engagements with performativity to acknowledge and advance the plurality of performance calculi within organizations. However, even critically minded authors persist in deploying managerial calculi of performance when criticizing the failure of management on its own terms. Equally, interpretive analyses of performance narratives as discursive power games have thus far offered little substantive challenge to managerial understandings of performativity, as orientated around maxims of efficiency, control and profit. Positioned against these managerialist and conservative tendencies in extant understandings of performativity, we draw together the ANT- derived notions of ontological performativity and politics, alongside empirical research on projects, and specifically project failure, to propose that if ontologies are performative, multiple, and political, then performativities are ontological, multiple and political, and are thus capable of being realized otherwise; but crucially, we can advance this thesis only if we better understand how managerial performativity simultaneously others and depends on that which is outside it: an absent hinterland of different performative realities. This theoretical move challenges how we might not only understand but assemble multiple performed realities — demanding new methodological, analytical and political resources and responses to engage with performativities.
Description: This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Elsevier under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence (CC BY). Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Sponsor: This work was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EPSRC [grant number: EP/E002323/1].
Version: Published
DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2013.01.004
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/11826
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2013.01.004
ISSN: 0956-5221
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Civil and Building Engineering)
Published Articles (Business School)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
1-s2.0-S0956522113000067-main.pdfPublished version422.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.