Loughborough University
Browse
Effect of direct-to-consumer genetic texts.pdf (256.12 kB)

Effect of direct-to-consumer genetic tests on health behaviour and anxiety: a survey of consumers and potential consumers

Download (256.12 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2013-09-20, 08:39 authored by Corin Egglestone, Anne Morris, Ann O'Brien
Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic tests can be purchased over the internet. Some companies claim to provide relative genetic risks for various diseases and thus encourage healthy behaviour. There are concerns that exposure to such information may actually discourage healthy behaviour or increase health anxiety. An online survey was conducted (n = 275). Respondents were composed of individuals who had purchased a DTC genetic test and received their results (consumers, n = 189), as well as individuals who were either awaiting test results or considering purchasing a test (potential consumers, n = 86). Consumers were asked if their health behaviour or health anxiety had changed after receiving their results. Respondents’ current health behaviour and health anxiety were queried and compared. In total, 27.3 % of consumers claimed a change in health behaviour, all either positive or neutral, with no reported cessation of any existing health behaviour. A change in health anxiety was claimed by 24.6 % of consumers, 85.3 % of which were a reduction. Consumers had significantly better health behaviour scores than potential consumers (p = 0.02), with no significant difference in health anxiety. This study points towards an association between receipt of DTC genetic test results and increased adoption of healthy behaviours for a minority of consumers based on self-report, with more mixed results in relation to health anxiety.

History

School

  • Science

Department

  • Information Science

Citation

EGGLESTONE, C., MORRIS, A. and O'BRIEN, A., 2013. Effect of direct-to-consumer genetic tests on health behaviour and anxiety: a survey of consumers and potential consumers. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22 (5), pp. 565-575.

Publisher

Springer © National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc.

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publication date

2013

Notes

This article was published in the Journal of Genetic Counseling [© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc.] and the definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9582-6

ISSN

1059-7700

Language

  • en

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC