Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/13229

Title: Contingency and action: a comparison of two forms of requesting
Authors: Curl, Traci S.
Drew, Paul
Keywords: Conversation
Indirectness
Preference
Politeness
Repair
Acts
Issue Date: 2008
Publisher: © Routledge (Taylor & Francis)
Citation: CURL, T.S. and DREW, P., 2008. Contingency and action: a comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41 (2), pp. 129 - 153.
Abstract: In this article, we explore the syntactic forms speakers use when making requests. An initial investigation of ordinary telephone calls between family and friends and out-of-hours calls to the doctor showed a difference in the distribution of modal verbs (e.g., Can you …), and requests prefaced by I wonder if. Modals are most common in ordinary conversation, whereas I wonder if … is most frequent in requests made to the doctor. This distributional difference seemed to be supported by calls from private homes to service organizations in which speakers also formatted requests as I wonder if. Further investigation of these and other corpora suggests that this distributional pattern is related not so much with the sociolinguistic speech setting but rather with speakers' orientations to known or anticipated contingencies associated with their request. The request forms speakers select embody, or display, their understandings of the contingencies associated with the recipient's ability to grant the request.
Description: This article was published in the journal, Research on Language and Social Interaction [© Routledge (Taylor & Francis)] and the definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028613
Sponsor: This is a report of research undertaken as part of the project Affiliation and Disaffiliation in Interaction: Language and Social Cohesion, funded by the British Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC; Grant No. RES–00023–0035). Under the terms of a European Science Foundation initiative, the ESRC—whose support is gratefully acknowledged—funded the British part of a five-nation study coordinated by Anna Lindström (University of Uppsala, Sweden). The title is “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.”
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1080/08351810802028613
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/13229
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028613
ISSN: 0835-1813
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Social Sciences)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Curl-Drew requests ROLSI.pdfAccepted version180.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.