Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/13279

Title: Women responding to the anti-Islam film Fitna: voices and acts of citizenship on YouTube
Authors: Vis, Farida
van Zoonen, Liesbet
Mihelj, Sabina
Keywords: Gender
Islam
YouTube
Fitna
Citizenship
Religion
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: © Palgrave Macmillan
Citation: VIS, F., VAN ZOONEN, L. and MIHELJ, S., 2011. Women responding to the anti-Islam film Fitna: voices and acts of citizenship on YouTube. Feminist Review, 97, pp.110-129.
Abstract: In 2008, Dutch anti-Islam Member of Parliament Geert Wilders produced a short video called Fitna to visualize his argument that Islam is a dangerous religion. Thousands of men and women across the globe uploaded their own videos to YouTube to criticize or support the film. In this article, we look at these alternative videos from a feminist perspective, contrasting the gender portrayal and narratives in Fitna with those in the alternative videos. We contend that Fitna expressed an extremist Orientalist discourse, in which women are presented as the current and future victims of the oppression of Muslim men and Islam. In contrast, the YouTube videos give voice to women themselves who come from across the globe, are relatively young and often active Muslims. Second, they express different view points in generically new ways, criticizing and ridiculing Wilders or producing serious and committed explanations of their own understanding of Islam. Third, although relatively few women appeared in the videos, those that did speak for themselves, not only take on Wilders, but also claim their right to speak within Islam. We propose to understand these videos as acts of citizenships through which women constitute themselves as global citizens, in some cases by engaging in ‘deliberation’ as it is understood in feminist political theory, in other cases by taking a ‘voice’ that can be responded to.
Description: This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in the journal Feminist Review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available online at:
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1057/fr.2010.29
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/13279
ISSN: 0141-7789
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Social Sciences)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Final Feminist Review.pdfAccepted version250.3 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.