Loughborough University
Browse
CS_article_final_29July09.pdf (156.78 kB)

Perceptions of labour market risks: shifts and continuities across generations

Download (156.78 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2013-10-16, 08:19 authored by Line NyhagenLine Nyhagen, Andreas Cebulla
In the risk society thesis, most notably forwarded by Ulrich Beck and Anthony Giddens, the labour market plays a key role in individualization processes. While for previous generations, family and personal networks, and also government institutions, were important in providing access to and mobility within the labour market, cohorts entering the labour market since the 1970s and onwards are perceived to be living in a modern 'risk regime', requiring each individual to make choices and decisions in relation to a market that no longer accommodates employment based on kinship and friendship. Based on data from 58 qualitative interviews with parents and their adult children, this article examines more closely these purported changes. The study's main observation is that important changes towards increased perceived individualization have taken place from one generation to the next. While affirming the disjuncture posited by Beck between a 'collectivized past' and an 'individualized present', this study's empirical evidence from two generations of individuals indicates that the disjuncture is muddier and more complex than previously understood. © The Author(s) 2011.

History

School

  • Social Sciences

Department

  • Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies

Citation

NYHAGEN PREDELLI, L. and CEBULLA, A., 2011. Perceptions of labour market risks: shifts and continuities across generations. Current Sociology, 59 (1), pp. 24 - 41.

Publisher

SAGE Publications for the International Sociological Association © The Author(s)

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publication date

2011

Notes

This article was published in the journal, Current Sociology [SAGE Publications for the International Sociological Association © The Author(s)] and the definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011392110385968

ISSN

0011-3921

eISSN

1461-7064

Language

  • en