Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/13401

Title: EUropean attachment and meanings of EUrope. A qualitative study in the EU-15
Authors: Antonsich, Marco
Keywords: Europe
Territorial attachment
Issue Date: 2008
Publisher: © Elsevier
Citation: ANTONSICH, M., 2008. EUropean attachment and meanings of EUrope. A qualitative study in the EU-15. Political Geography, 27 (6), pp.691-710.
Abstract: The present article explores meanings of EUrope as they emerged in individual interviews and focus-groups organized around the question of European attachment. The article shows that the ways people make sense of EUrope can be divided into three major categories: cultural-national, cultural-transnational, and functionalutilitarian. Cultural-national referents describe EUrope through the prism of the nation-state and reproduce the isomorphism between territory and identity which has characterized, at least in theory, the nation-state itself. Cultural-transnational referents present EUrope as a normative model for the rest of the world, a model for ‘another’ globalization, more social and less liberalist, and a champion of humanitarianism and international peace. Functional-utilitarian referents address EUrope as a space which could help the individual and/or the collectivity to which the individual belongs to enhance their well-being. In this latter case, EUrope resonates with a post-national space, one which goes beyond the isomorphism between territory and identity. The article argues that the reasons why people might identify with and support EUrope are different, and not always driven by feelings of emotional attachment. As such, the article brings empirical evidence to the thesis that a EUropean demos, understood as a sense of collective identity, should not be considered as a necessary condition for the existence of a EUropean polity.
Description: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Political Geography. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.07.004
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.07.004
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/13401
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.07.004
ISSN: 0962-6298
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Geography and Environment)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
PG_2008_Lupin.pdfAccepted version124.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.