Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/14192

Title: Engineering the scientific corpus: routine semantic work in (re)constructing a biological ontology
Authors: Sharrock, Wes
Randall, Dave
Greiffenhagen, Christian
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: ZHB Luzern/University Library Lucerne
Citation: SHARROCK, W., RANDALL, D. and GREIFFENHAGEN, C., 2011. Engineering the scientific corpus: routine semantic work in (re)constructing a biological ontology. Ethnographic Studies, 12 pp. 106 - 125
Abstract: In face of the burgeoning interest in ‘ontology’ in science studies, Michael Lynch (2008) called for a move toward ‘ontography’, to talking about ontologies by way of studies in which ontologies (or at least, an ontology) are of demonstrable relevance to the doings of those being studied. This paper provides an ontography, or some part of one, in that it reports on work in ontology development being done by a group of researchers in bioinformatics, drawing its examples largely from a workshop in which some members of that group were participant and which was organised by a research network to which they belonged. Methodologies for building ‘good’ ontologies were part of the interests of this wider research group and were a motivation for the work undertaken. What is evident from our study is the fact that methods to be applied, avenues to be explored and even fundamental purposes were all in the event ‘up for grabs’ and formed a closely interlinked and mutually explicating part of the ‘logic in practice’ deployed. We will show how this research work was undertaken with reference to an existing body of knowledge, yet requiring distinctive courses of ‘discovering work’, concerning both method and substantive content. How were its results examined and reexamined in the light of ongoing, evolving and unanticipated considerations? Describing how the involved participants go about their work is, then, ‘an ontography’ in precisely the sense that Lynch proposes.
Description: This article was published in the open access journal, Ethnographic Studies. It is also available at: http://edoc.zhbluzern.ch/oaj/es/ethnographic_studies_12_07.pdf
Version: Published
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/14192
Publisher Link: http://www.zhbluzern.ch/index.php?id=2580
ISSN: 1366-4964
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
sharrock-et-al-biological-ontology.pdfPublished version305.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.