+44 (0)1509 263171
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Medical rapid prototyping technologies: state of the art and current limitations for application in oral and maxillofacial surgery|
|Authors: ||Winder, John|
Bibb, Richard J.
|Keywords: ||Medical rapid prototyping|
Fused deposition modelling
|Issue Date: ||2005|
|Publisher: ||© Elsevier|
|Citation: ||WINDER, J. and BIBB, R.J., 2005. Medical rapid prototyping technologies: state of the art and current limitations for application in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 63 (7), pp.1006-1015.|
We describe state of the art software and hardware requirements for the manufacture of high quality medical
models manufactured using medical rapid prototyping. The source of the medical model artefacts and there
physical appearance are illustrated along with remedies for their removal.
Materials and Methods
Medical models were built using predominantly stereolithography and fused deposition modelling at both
institutions over a period of 6 years. A combined total of 350 models have been produced for a range of
maxillofacial, neurosurgical and orthopaedic applications. Stereolithography, fused deposition modelling
computerised numerical milling and other technologies are described.
A range of unwanted artefacts that create distortions on medical models have been identified. These include,
data import, CT gantry distortion, metal, motion, surface roughness due to support structure removal or surface
modelling and image data thresholding. The source of the artefact has been related to the patient, imaging
modality performance or the modelling technology. Discussion as to the significance of the artefacts on clinical
use is provided.
It is recommended that models of human anatomy generated by medical rapid prototyping are subject to
rigorous quality assurance at all stages of the manufacturing process. Clinicians should be aware of potential
areas for inaccuracies within models and review the source images in cases where model integrity is in doubt.|
|Description: ||This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.03.016|
|Version: ||Accepted for publication|
|Publisher Link: ||http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.03.016|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles (Design School)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.