+44 (0)1509 263171
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Real-world performance of vehicle crash test: the case of EuroNCAP|
|Authors: ||Segui-Gomez, Maria|
Lopez-Valdes, Francisco J.
|Issue Date: ||2010|
|Publisher: ||© BMJ Publishing Group|
|Citation: ||SEGUI-GOMEZ, M., LOPEZ-VALDES, F.J. and FRAMPTON, R., 2010. Real-world performance of vehicle crash test: the case of EuroNCAP. Injury Prevention, 16 (2), pp. 101 - 106.|
|Abstract: ||Objective To investigate whether the occupants in vehicles with better safety ratings according to EuroNCAP sustain fewer fatal and severe injuries than occupants in vehicles with worse experimental safety ratings when in frontal crashes.
Design Case–control study.
Setting A representative sample of crashes in Britain from 1996 to 2008 as gathered in the Cooperative Crash Injury Study (CCIS) database under the auspices of the UK Department of Transportation and augmented with EuroNCAP experimental ratings for each crashed vehicle.
Subjects Drivers and front seat passengers while occupants of vehicles for which EuroNCAP test results were available and who met inclusion criteria meant to select those in crashes similar to those in the frontal experimental setting.
Main outcome measures Fatality and severe MAIS3+ injuries to the head, thorax, pelvis and lower extremities.
Results The multivariate Poisson regression models on the 1259 cases who sustained crash conditions most similar to the experimental ones showed no statistically significant effect on either mortality or MAIS3+ injury in real-world crashes when travelling in cars with better safety ratings. For example, when compared to a driver in a vehicle rated as safest for head injuries MAIS3+ in frontal crashes, drivers in vehicles rated yellow or orange presented adjusted ORs of 0.6 (0.2 to 1.7) and 0.8 (0.3 to 2.1), respectively.
Conclusions No statistically significant relationships between the EuroNCAP safety scores and real-world death or severe injury outcomes were found, suggesting the need to review biomechanical criteria chosen to set cut-off points for the rating system.|
|Description: ||Closed access.|
|Sponsor: ||This work has been supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education and
Science (ref TRA 2006-14280/AUT) and partially supported by La Caixa Foundation.
This paper uses accident data from the United Kingdom Co-operative Crash Injury
Study (CCIS). CCIS is managed by TRL Ltd on behalf of the Department for Transport
(Transport Technology and Standards Division) who fund the project with Autoliv, Ford
Motor Company, Nissan Motor Europe and Toyota Motor Europe. Data were collected
by teams from the Birmingham Automotive Safety Centre of the University of
Birmingham, the Vehicle Safety Research Centre at Loughborough University and the
Vehicle & Operator Services Agency of the Department for Transport. Further
information on CCIS can be found at http://www.ukccis.org. All authors are
independent from funders.|
|Publisher Link: ||http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ip.2009.023812|
|Appears in Collections:||Closed Access (Design School)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.