+44 (0)1509 263171
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Communities of practice in construction case study organisations : questions and insights|
|Authors: ||Ruikar, Kirti|
|Issue Date: ||2009|
|Publisher: ||© Emerald Group|
|Citation: ||RUIKAR, K., KOSKELA, L. and SEXTON, M., 2009. Communities of practice in construction case study organisations : questions and insights. Construction Innovation, 9 (4), pp. 434-448.|
|Abstract: ||PURPOSE – At the heart of knowledge management (KM) are the people – an organisation’s
important knowledge asset. Although this is widely acknowledged, businesses seldom understand
this axiom in terms of the communities through which individuals develop and share the capacity to
create and use knowledge. It is the collective learning that takes place within the social systems, i.e.
communities of practice (CoP) that are of particular significance to an organisation from a KM
perspective. This paper aims to review, critique, and raise some pertinent questions on the role of
CoPs; and with the help of case studies shed light on the “goings-on” in construction practices.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH – After critically reviewing the literature on CoPs and querying
some underlying assertions, this research investigates how these issues are addressed in practice.
A case study approach is adopted. Three organisations operating in the construction sector are
interviewed for the purpose of this paper.
FINDINGS – Case study findings highlight the potential challenges and benefits of CoPs to a
construction organisation, the role they play in generating and delivering value to the organisation and
their contribution towards the collective organisational intelligence. From the findings, it is clear that
the question is not whether communities exist within organisations, but how they deliver value to the
organisation. From an organisational perspective, the key challenge is to provide an environment that
is conducive to developing and nurturing such communities as opposed to merely creating them.
PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS – Challenges and benefits demonstrated through the case studies should be
taken in context. The findings are not intended to be prescriptive in nature, but are intentionally
descriptive to provide contextual data that allow readers to draw their own inferences in the context of
their organisations. They should be applied taking into account an organisation’s unique
characteristics and differentiators, the dynamics of the environment in which it operates and the
culture it harbours within.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE – Investigating the role of CoPs in the context of case study construction
organisations forms the prime focus of this paper.|
|Description: ||This article is © Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/15251. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.|
|Sponsor: ||Funded by the UK Engineering and Physical
Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) under Grant number EP/C534220/1.|
|Version: ||Submitted for publication|
|Publisher Link: ||http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14714170910995967|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles (Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.