Beware the ‘Loughborough School’ of social psychology? Interaction and the politics of intervention

Stokoe, Elizabeth; Hepburn, Alexa; Antaki, Charles

beware final.pdf (417.99 kB)

Beware the ‘Loughborough School’ of social psychology? Interaction and the politics of intervention

journal contribution

posted on 2014-07-21, 10:52 authored by Elizabeth Stokoe, Alexa Hepburn, Charles Antaki

The authors explain the attractions of applying discursive psychology (DP) and conversation analysis (CA) by reporting three different examples of their engagement with practitioners and clients. Along the way, a case is made for separating DP/CA from other kinds of qualitative analysis in social psychology, and for deconstructing some commonly held misunderstandings and caricatures of DP/CA.

History

School

Social Sciences

Department

Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies

Published in

British Journal of Social Psychology

Volume

51

Issue

3

Pages

486 - 496

Citation

STOKOE, E., HEPBURN, A. and ANTAKI, C., 2012. Beware the ‘Loughborough School’ of social psychology? Interaction and the politics of intervention. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51 (3), pp. 486-496.

Publisher

Wiley (© The British Psychological Society)

Version

AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publication date

2012

Notes

This is the accepted version of the following article: STOKOE, E., HEPBURN, A. and ANTAKI, C., 2012. Beware the ‘Loughborough School’ of social psychology? Interaction and the politics of intervention. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51 (3), pp. 486-496, which has been published in final form at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02088.x. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.