RobertsFinal8.pdf (152.75 kB)
Postconflict peacebuilding, liberal irrelevance and the locus of legitimacy
Post-conflict peacebuilding is failing, according to both its critics and its advocates. By way of solutions, proponents seek more of the same, whereas opponents argue for a radical shift. Both contain parts of a possible solution to the lack of local legitimacy that stigmatizes interventions, many of which descend into violence within five years and few of which produce democracies. This article advances the idea of a ‘popular peace’ that refocuses liberal institution building upon local, democratically-determined priorities deriving from ‘everyday lives’, in addition to internationally-favoured preferences (such as metropolitan courts and bureaucratic government). This is hypothesized to better confront the prevailing legitimacy lacuna, create social institutions around which a contract can evolve, and generate the foundations upon which durable peacebuilding may grow.
History
School
- Social Sciences
Department
- Politics and International Studies
Published in
International PeacekeepingVolume
18Issue
2Pages
410 - 424 (14)Citation
ROBERTS, D., 2011. Postconflict peacebuilding, liberal irrelevance and the locus of legitimacy. International Peacekeeping, 18 (4), pp. 410-424.Publisher
© Taylor & FrancisVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publication date
2011Notes
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Peacekeeping on 30-08-2011, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13533312.2011.588388.ISSN
1353-3312eISSN
1743-906XPublisher version
Language
- en