Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/15486

Title: Threats: power, family mealtimes and social influence
Authors: Hepburn, Alexa
Potter, Jonathan
Keywords: Social psychology
Discursive psychology
Conversation analysis
Family mealtimes
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: Wiley (© British Psychological Society)
Citation: HEPBURN, A. and POTTER, J., 2011. Threats: power, family mealtimes and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50 (1), pp. 99-120.
Abstract: One of the most basic topics in social psychology is the way one agent influences the behaviour of another. This paper will focus on threats, which are an intensified form of attempted behavioural influence. Despite the centrality to the project of social psychology little attention has been paid to threats. This paper will start to rectify this oversight. It reviews early examples of the way social psychology handles threats and highlights key limitations and presuppositions about the nature and role of threats. By contrast, we subject them to a programme of empirical research. Data comprise video records of a collection of family mealtimes that include pre-school children. Threats are recurrent in this material. A preliminary conceptualization of features of candidate threats from this corpus will be used as an analytic start point. A series of examples are used to explicate basic features and dimensions that build the action of threatening. The basic structure of the threats uses a conditional logic: if the recipient continues problem action/does not initiate required action then negative consequences will be produced by the speaker. Further analysis clarifies how threats differ from warnings and admonishments. Sequential analysis suggests threats set up basic response options of compliance or defiance. However, recipients of threats can evade these options by, for example, reworking the unpleasant upshot specified in the threat, or producing barely minimal compliance. The implications for broader social psychological concerns are explored in a discussion of power, resistance and asymmetry; the paper ends by reconsidering the way social influence can be studied in social psychology.
Description: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: HEPBURN, A. and POTTER, J., 2011. Threats: power, family mealtimes and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50 (1), pp. 99-120, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466610X500791. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1348/014466610X500791
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/15486
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466610X500791
ISSN: 0144-6665
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Hepburn and Potter Threats march 2010.pdfAccepted version652.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.