Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/15491

Title: The rationalist tradition and the problem of induction: Karl Popper's rejection of epistemological optimism
Authors: Parvin, Phil
Keywords: Philosophy
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: © Elsevier
Citation: PARVIN, P., 2011. The rationalist tradition and the problem of induction: Karl Popper's rejection of epistemological optimism. History of European Ideas, 37 (3), pp. 257-266.
Abstract: This article evaluates Karl Popper's contribution to analytic philosophy, and outlines some of the contradictions in his work which make it difficult to locate in any particular tradition. In particular, the article investigates Popper's own claims to be a member of the rationalist tradition. Although Popper described himself as a member of this tradition, his definition of it diverged quite radically from that offered by other supporters of rationalism, like, for example, Mach, Carnap, and the logical positivists of the Vienna Circle. The reason for this was that the rationalist tradition, if it were to remain coherent and relevant, needed to overcome the dilemma posed by Hume’s problem of induction. Popper believed that this problem rendered conventional understandings of rationalism, science, and inductive reasoning incoherent. This article suggests that Popper's principal contribution to modern philosophy was to reconfigure the rationalist tradition in such a way as to circumvent the problem of induction while preserving the rationalist commitment to reason, rational debate, and objective knowledge. Popper's reconfiguration of the epistemological bases of the rationalist tradition challenged dominant understandings of rationalist and analytic philosophy, and may be appropriately understood as part of a wider move among philosophers like Quine and Putnam to challenge conventional understandings of analytic philosophy, and of what philosophy itself could and could not achieve. It also informed a vision of social and political life (and of the social and political sciences) as rooted in principles of freedom, equality, and rational debate, but which cannot be fit within the traditional ideological landscape.
Description: NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in History of European Ideas. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in History of European Ideas, 37 (3), pp. 257-266, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2010.10.005.
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2010.10.005
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/15491
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2010.10.005
ISSN: 0191-6599
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Politics and International Studies)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
popper piece for HEI pdf.pdfAccepted version292.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.