Reply to Moisio and Harle from Marco version 3_to upload.pdf (41.54 kB)
In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle
The author of a recently published paper on Finland's identity politics and national identity (Antonsich, 2005) responds to comments presented in the preceding paper in this issue of Eurasian Geography and Economics (Moisio and Harle, 2006). The rejoinder focuses on the nature of place knowledge acquired "in place" versus "at distance" as well as on more specific differences in perspective (e.g., use of sources, terminology, critical geopolitcs). Copyright © 2006 by V. H. Winston & Son, Inc. All rights reserved.
History
School
- Social Sciences
Department
- Geography and Environment
Published in
Eurasian Geography and EconomicsVolume
47Issue
2Pages
211 - 215Citation
ANTONSICH, M., 2006. In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 47 (2), pp.211-215.Publisher
Routledge (© V. H. Winston & Son, Inc)Version
- SMUR (Submitted Manuscript Under Review)
Publisher statement
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Publication date
2006Notes
This is an Submitted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Eurasian Geography and Economics on 15/05/2013 available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.2747/1538-7216.47.2.211ISSN
1538-7216Publisher version
Language
- en