Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/16152

Title: How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children's mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior
Authors: De Smedt, Bert
Noel, Marie-Pascale
Gilmore, Camilla K.
Ansari, Daniel
Keywords: Mathematical learning disabilities
Magnitude representation
Comparison
Dyscalculia
Approximate number system
Issue Date: 2013
Publisher: © Elsevier GmbH
Citation: DE SMEDT, B. ... et al, 2013. How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children's mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2 (2), pp. 48 - 55
Abstract: Many studies tested the association between numerical magnitude processing and mathematics achievement, but results differ depending on the number format used. For symbolic numbers (digits), data are consistent and robust across studies and populations: weak performance correlates with low math achievement and dyscalculia. For non-symbolic formats (dots), many conflicting findings have been reported. These inconsistencies might be explained by methodological issues. Alternatively, it might be that the processes measured by non-symbolic tasks are not critical for school-relevant mathematics. A few neuroimaging studies revealed that brain activation during number comparison correlates with children's mathematics achievement level, but the consistency of such relationships for symbolic and non-symbolic processing is unclear. These neurocognitive data provided ground for educational interventions, which seem to have positive effects on children's numerical development in (a)typical populations.
Description: “NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Trends in Neuroscience and Education. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2 (2), 2013, DOI: 10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.001
Sponsor: Bert De Smedt is funded by grant GOA2012/010 of the Research Fund KULeuven, Belgium. Marie-Pascale Noël is supported by the National Research Fund of Belgium. Camilla Gilmore is funded by a British Academy Fellowship. Daniel Ansari is funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the Canada Research Chairs Program (CRC).
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.001
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/16152
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.001
ISSN: 2211-9493
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Mathematics Education Centre)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
DeSmedt,Noel,Gilmore&Ansari(2013).pdfAccepted version626.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.