Loughborough University
Browse
repository version.pdf (404.92 kB)

What is the relationship between long working hours, over-employment, under-employment and the subjective well-being of workers. Longitudinal evidence from the UK.

Download (404.92 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2015-03-11, 16:38 authored by David Angrave, Andy Charlwood
Are long working hours, over-employment and under-employment associated with a reduction in subjective well-being (SWB)? If they are, is the association long or short-lasting? This paper answers these questions through within-person analysis of a nationally representative longitudinal survey from the United Kingdom. The results suggest that long working hours of work do not directly affect SWB, but in line with theories of person-environment fit, both over-employment and under-employment are associated with lower SWB. However, over-employment is more likely for those who work the longest hours. The duration of the SWB penalty associated with over-employment and under-employment is typically short, but SWB levels tend to remain depressed for those who remain over-employed for two years or more. Results suggest that state and organisational policies that reduce the incidence of long hours working may enhance aggregate well-being levels.

History

School

  • Business and Economics

Department

  • Business

Published in

Human Relations

Volume

68

Issue

9

Pages

1491 - 1515

Citation

ANGRAVE, D. and CHARLWOOD, A., 2015. What is the relationship between long working hours, over-employment, under-employment and the subjective well-being of workers. Longitudinal evidence from the UK. Human Relations, 68(9), pp.1491-1515.

Publisher

Sage Publications / © The Authors

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publisher statement

This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Publication date

2015-03-26

Notes

This paper was accepted for publication in the journal Human Relations and the definitive published version is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726714559752

ISSN

0018-7267

Language

  • en