+44 (0)1509 263171
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Beauty is not simplicity: an analysis of mathematicians' proof appraisals|
|Authors: ||Inglis, Matthew|
|Issue Date: ||2014|
|Publisher: ||© Oxford University Press|
|Citation: ||INGLIS, M. and ABERDEIN, A., 2014. Beauty is not simplicity: an analysis of mathematicians' proof appraisals. Philosophia Mathematica, 23 (1), pp.87-109|
|Abstract: ||What do mathematicians mean when they use terms such as 'deep', 'elegant', and 'beautiful'? By applying empirical methods developed by social psychologists, we demonstrate that mathematicians' appraisals of proofs vary on four dimensions: aesthetics, intricacy, utility, and precision. We pay particular attention to mathematical beauty and show that, contrary to the classical view, beauty and simplicity are almost entirely unrelated in mathematics.|
|Description: ||This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Philosophia Mathematica following peer review. The version of record INGLIS, M. and ABERDEIN, A., 2014. Beauty is not simplicity: an analysis of mathematicians' proof appraisals. Philosophia Mathematica, 23 (1), pp. 87 - 109 is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/philmat/nku014.|
This paper is closed access until 26th July 2015.
|Sponsor: ||This work was supported by a Royal Society Worshipful Company of Actuaries Research Fellowship.|
|Version: ||Accepted for publication|
|Publisher Link: ||http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/philmat/nku014|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles (Mathematics Education Centre)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.