+44 (0)1509 263171
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Sustainable aviation futures: crises, contested realities and prospects for Change|
|Authors: ||Budd, Lucy C.S.|
|Keywords: ||Air travel|
|Issue Date: ||2013|
|Publisher: ||© Emerald Group Publishing|
|Citation: ||BUDD, L.C.S., GRIGGS, S. and HOWARTH, D., 2013. Sustainable aviation futures: crises, contested realities and prospects for change. IN: Budd, L.C.S., Griggs, S. and Howarth, D. (eds). Sustainable Aviation Futures. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 3 - 36.|
|Series/Report no.: ||Transport and Sustainability;4|
This chapter examines the torsions and blind spots that structure the contemporary debate on the politics and policy of aviation. It also generates different scenarios for the future of air travel, which can help to unblock the current impasse about the perceived costs and benefits of aviation and its attendant infrastructural needs.
This chapter characterises and evaluates the competing frames that organise the contested realities of air transport. By mapping out the current fault lines of aviation politics and policy, the chapter is also able to delineate four main scenarios regarding the future of aviation, which we name the ‘post-carbon’, ‘high-modernist’, ‘market regulation’ and ‘demand management’ projections respectively.
The chapter problematises and criticises the existing literature, policy reports and stakeholder briefings that inform the contemporary standoff in UK aviation policy. It uses the definition of sustainable development as a heuristic device to map and identify the fault lines structuring contemporary debates on aviation futures. It then builds upon this analysis to delimit four different scenarios for the future of flying.
The chapter analyses the contested realities of aviation politics. It re-affirms the political nature of such divisions, which in turn structure the rival understandings of aviation. The analysis suggests that the identified fault lines are constantly reiterated by competing appeals to ambiguous and contradictory evidence-bases or policy frames. Ultimately, the chapter claims that any significant reframing of aviation policy and politics rests on the outcome of political negotiations and persuasion. But it also depends on the broader views of citizens and stakeholders about the future challenges facing society, as well as the way in which governments and affected agents put in place and coordinate the multiple arenas in which a dialogue over the future of aviation can be held. Aviation futures cannot be reduced to the narrow confines of the technical merits or claims surrounding the feasibility of policy instruments.|
|Description: ||This article is © Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/handle/2134/17613. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited. The definitive version is available here: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S2044-9941(2013)0000004013|
|Version: ||Submitted for publication|
|Publisher Link: ||http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S2044-9941(2013)0000004013|
|Appears in Collections:||Book Chapters (Civil and Building Engineering)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.