Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/17656

Title: Comparing additive manufacturing technologies for customised wrist splints
Authors: Paterson, Abby
Bibb, Richard J.
Campbell, R.I.
Bingham, Guy A.
Keywords: Textile
Additive manufacture
Heterogeneous
Orthotic
Wrist splint
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Citation: PATERSON, A. ... et al., 2015. Comparing additive manufacturing technologies for customised wrist splints. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 21 (3), pp. 230-243.
Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to compare four different additive manufacturing (AM) processes to assess their suitability in the context of upper extremity splinting. Design/methodology/approach – This paper describes the design characteristics and subsequent fabrication of six different wrist splints using four different AM processes: laser sintering (LS), fused deposition modelling (FDM), stereolithography (SLA) and polyjet material jetting via Objet Connex. The suitability of each process was then compared against competing designs and processes from traditional splinting. The splints were created using a digital design workflow that combined recognised clinical best practice with design for AM principles. Findings – Research concluded that, based on currently available technology, FDM was considered the least suitable AM process for upper extremity splinting. LS, SLA and material jetting show promise for future applications, but further research and development into AM processes, materials and splint design optimisation is required if the full potential is to be realised. Originality/value – Unlike previous work that has applied AM processes to replicate traditional splint designs, the splints described are based on a digital design for AM workflow, incorporating novel features and physical properties not previously possible in clinical splinting. The benefits of AM for customised splint fabrication have been summarised. A range of AM processes have also been evaluated for splinting, exposing the limitations of existing technology, demonstrating novel and advantageous design features and opportunities for future research.
Description: This article is (©) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here (http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2013-0099). Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Sponsor: Loughborough University
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-10-2013-0099
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/17656
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2013-0099
ISSN: 1355-2546
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Design School)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Final RPJ submission.pdfAccepted version1.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.