Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/18109

Title: Planet or people? Redefining the ideological position of sustainable design
Authors: Santamaria, Laura
Escobar-Tello, M. Carolina
Ross, Tracy
Keywords: Sustainability discourse
Semiotic and cultural analysis
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: European Academy of Design
Citation: SANTAMARIA, L., ESCOBAR-TELLO, M.C. and ROSS, T., 2015. Planet or people? Redefining the ideological position of sustainable design. IN: Proceedings of the 11th International European Academy of Design Conference: The Value of Design Research, 22nd-24th April 2014, Paris, France.
Abstract: Despite the growing awareness of the concept of sustainability society-wide, the diffusion and uptake of sustainable innovations and practices remains slow and niche. Many have attributed the lack of uptake to an ineffective sustainability discourse, which fails to drive the desired behaviours due to the limited appeal, relevance and meaning it bears in people’s lives. This paper contributes to a better understanding of the discrepancies between intended and perceived meanings generated by discourse framing and representations. The study first maps a trajectory of the sustainability concept in culture (its past, present and emerging cultural associations) using Raymond Williams (1977) Residual, Dominant and Emergent methodology. The analysis is structured in three periods, reflecting two important cultural shifts in the sustainability discourse: the ecology era, the sustainability era and the innovation era. These map the transformation of the meaning of sustainability over time, and from ‘marginality’ towards (potential) ‘popularity’. Secondly, as the ‘value proposition’ of sustainability poses an unapparent opposition of interests between ‘planet’ and ‘people’ – a dilemma posed by sustainable consumption – we set to analyse the positions and ideologies in tension within the discourse by mapping these polarities in a Greimasian square. Some conclusions are drawn upon how these positions might influence people’s views, engagement and behaviour towards sustainable products and practices. The results suggest that propositions which present sustainability as a means for ‘environmental protection’ (environmental benefits) might be unfavourable to generate mainstream appeal and engagement, while discursive frames which present it as a means to enhance ‘quality of life’ (personal and/or social wellbeing benefits) may offer better predisposition and appeal. The study also exemplifies the value of integrating socio-semiotic and cultural analysis methods into design research and design ethnography for ‘decoding’ possible unarticulated socio-cultural meanings of artefacts and communications. In this particular case, the methodology has helped to identify a favourable path to strategically advance the legitimation and appeal of sustainability values and accelerate its cultural transition.
Description: This conference paper is closed access.
Version: Published
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/18109
Publisher Link: http://thevalueofdesignresearch.com/category/conference-ead-11/
Appears in Collections:Closed Access (Design School)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Planet or People_1248_EAD.pdfPublished version621.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.