Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/18110

Title: Offers of assistance in politician-constituent interaction
Authors: Hofstetter, Emily
Stokoe, Elizabeth
Keywords: Politicians
Political discourse
Constituency work
Conversation analysis
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Citation: HOFSTETTER, E. and STOKOE, E., 2015. Offers of assistance in politician-constituent interaction. Discourse Studies, 17(6), pp.724-751.
Abstract: How do politicians engage with and offer to assist their constituents; the people who vote them into power? We address the question by analyzing a corpus of 80 interactions recorded at the office of a Member of Parliament (MP) in the United Kingdom, and comprising telephone calls between constituents and the MP’s clerical ‘caseworkers’ as well as face to face encounters with MPs in their fortnightly ‘surgeries’. The data were transcribed, then analysed using conversation analysis, focusing on the design and placement of offers of assistance. We identified three types of offers within a longer ‘offering’ sequence: 1) ‘proposal offers’, which typically appear first in any offering sequence, in which politicians and caseworkers make proposals to help their constituents using formats that request permission to do so, or check that the constituent does indeed want help (e.g., “do you want me to”; “we could…”); 2) ‘announcement offers’, which appear second, and indicate that something has been decided and confirm the intention to act (e.g., “I will do X”), and 3) ‘request offers’, which appear third, and take for form “let me do X”. Request offers indicate that the offer is available but cannot be completed until the current conversation is closed; they also appear in environments in which the constituent reissues their problems and appears dissatisfied with the offers so far. The paper contributes to what we know about making offers in institutional settings, as well as shedding the first empirical light on the workings of the constituency office: the site of engagement between everyday members of the public and their elected representatives.
Description: This paper was accepted in the journal Discourse Studies [© Sage] and the definitive version is available at http:dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445615602376
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1177/1461445615602376
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/18110
Publisher Link: http:dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445615602376
ISSN: 1461-7080
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Social Sciences)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Hofstetter Stokoe 2015 Offers IR version June 2015.pdfAccepted version483.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.