Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/18245

Title: What kind of dialogue do we need? Gender, deliberation and comprehensive values
Authors: Chambers, Clare
Parvin, Phil
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: © Cambridge University Press
Citation: CHAMBERS, C. and PARVIN, P., 2011. What kind of dialogue do we need? Gender, deliberation and comprehensive values. IN: Browne, J. (ed). Dialogue, Politics and Gender. Cambridge University Press, pp. 198 - 226.
Abstract: Recent branches of political theory, including feminism, communitarianism, identity theory and difference theory, have criticised liberalism and liberal democratic politics for failing to recognise the importance of group diversity and identity. In response, political and democratic theorists have increasingly appealed to public deliberation as a means of resolving political questions. Deliberative democrats, for example, have sought to move beyond traditional understandings of democracy as a merely representative system by recasting it as a regime in which individual citizens determine policy outcomes and political decisions through their active participation in public dialogue with one another. Many liberals, meanwhile, have increasingly sought to ground liberal principles in agreements struck between participants in some form of deliberative process. That is, having taken on board claims about the importance of difference and identity to the ways in which people think and the values they hold, many liberal political theorists have felt the need to retreat from controversial commitments to substantive principles such as autonomy, and have instead grounded their theories in a more general commitment to public dialogue. Where liberalism was generally seen as either a perfectionist theory which stipulated the supremacy of certain values over others or a contractualist theory premised upon some appropriately modelled agreement between individuals bound by common standards of rationality, it is now increasingly seen as a deliberative theory rooted in inclusive dialogue among situated individuals. In making the transition from contractualism to deliberation, many liberals feel that they have developed a more effective way of justifying liberal principles in circumstances of diversity, by foregrounding inclusive, collective dialogue over hypothetical contracts and agreement models which require everyone to act and think in the same way.
Description: This is a chapter from the book Dialogue, Politics and Gender © Cambridge University Press. Reprinted with permission.
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139855938.009
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/18245
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139855938.009
ISBN: 9781107038899
Appears in Collections:Book Chapters (PHIR)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
9781107038899c08_p198-226.pdfAccepted version241.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.