Drew & Hepburn Absent Apologies.pdf (204.19 kB)
Absent apologies
journal contribution
posted on 2015-07-29, 10:11 authored by Paul Drew, Alexa HepburnAbsent apologies – apologies that were expected but which are not forthcoming – are quite frequently identified and commented upon, for instance in the media. In this paper we discuss two kinds of evidence that apologies can be noticeably absent for participants in ordinary interactions. The first kind is the delays that can occur in the progressivity in talk until an apology is forthcoming, particularly in cases where interlocutors are misaligned about culpability for a transgression. Such cases typically involve pursuit of an appropriate apology (admission), and an account for the other's (mis)conduct. The second kind of evidence is that, where speakers fail to apologise for a putative transgression, their interlocutors can nevertheless treat the other's prior turn as though it had been an apology, by absolving them of culpability in the standard way, e.g. ‘that's alright’. We show that such absolution can occur irrespective of whether culpability is admitted and an apology proferred.
History
School
- Social Sciences
Department
- Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies
Published in
Discourse ProcessesCitation
DREW, P. and HEPBURN, A., 2016. Absent apologies. Discourse Processes, 53(1/2), pp.114-131.Publisher
© Taylor and FrancisVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publisher statement
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Publication date
2016Notes
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Discourse Processes on 14 Jun 2015, available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1056690ISSN
0163-853XPublisher version
Language
- en