Loughborough University
Browse
Teachers' and Pupils' perceptions of Creativity across different Key Stages July 2012.pdf (122.11 kB)

Teachers' and pupils' perceptions of creativity across different key stages

Download (122.11 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2015-09-07, 12:16 authored by Sarah Turner
The new Secondary Curriculum (implemented in 2008) saw greater emphasis on creativity within the National Curriculum for England. Since this term has been boldly stated, how have teachers and pupils responded to it in the classroom? This study draws on responses from a range of pupils in different Key Stages (2 (pupils aged 7-11), 3 (pupils aged 11-14) , 4 (pupils aged 14-16), and 5) who reported that creativity helped their learning and engaged them. Teachers participated by completing a questionnaire and their responses showed teachers' differing approaches to defining (and therefore showing their understanding of applying) creativity (innovative teaching, different activities for teaching and learning). A varied list of methods for embedding it in their teaching was provided. Many more primary teachers than secondary explored their use of creative teaching and appeared more comfortable with this approach. The initiatives taken to encourage teachers to adopt a more creative approach have had some impact; however, more training is required. © 2013 Manchester University Press.

History

School

  • Design

Published in

Research in Education

Volume

89

Issue

1

Pages

23 - 40

Citation

TURNER, S., 2013. Teachers' and pupils' perceptions of creativity across different key stages. Research in Education, 89 (1), pp. 23 - 40.

Publisher

© Manchester University Press

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publisher statement

This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Publication date

2013

Notes

This is the accepted version of an article subsequently published in the journal, Research in Education [© Manchester University Press]. The definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/RIE.89.1.3

ISSN

0034-5237

eISSN

2050-4608

Language

  • en

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC