Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/18693

Title: Towards an understanding of the relationship between disciplinary research cultures and open access repository behaviours
Authors: Fry, Jenny
Spezi, Valerie
Probets, Steve
Creaser, Claire
Keywords: Open Access
Open Access Repositories
Researcher behaviours
Domain analysis
Research cultures
Economics and clinical medicine
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Wiley / © ASIS&T
Citation: FRY, J. ... et al, 2015. Towards an understanding of the relationship between disciplinary research cultures and open access repository behaviours. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67 (11), pp. 2710-2724.
Abstract: This paper explores the cultural characteristics of three ‘open access (OA) friendly’ disciplines (physics, economics and clinical medicine) and the ways in which those characteristics influence perceptions, motivations and behaviours towards green OA. The empirical data are taken from two online surveys of European authors. Taking a domain analytic approach, the analysis draws on Becher and Trowler’s (2001) and Whitley’s (2000) theories to gain a deeper understanding of why open access repositories (OAR) play a particularly important role in the chosen disciplines. The surveys provided a unique opportunity to compare perceptions, motivations and behaviours of researchers at the discipline level with the parent metadiscipline. Albeit, participants were not drawn from a stratified sample of all the different sub-disciplines that constitute each discipline and therefore the generalizability of the findings to the discipline is limited. The differential role of informal and formal communication in each of the three disciplines has shaped green OA practices. For physicists and economists, preprints are an essential feature of their respective OAR landscapes, whereas for clinical medics final published articles have a central role. In comparing the disciplines with their parent metadisciplines there were some notable similarities/differences, which have methodological implications for studying research cultures.
Description: This article is closed access until October 2017.
Sponsor: The authors would like to acknowledge funding from PEER for the PEER Behavioural Research conducted between 2009-2011, which enabled the collection of the data used in this article.
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23621
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/18693
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23621
ISSN: 2330-1635
Appears in Collections:Closed Access (English and Drama)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
PEER_revision_JASIST_MAIN-DOC_20JUL15(with figs tables for IR).pdfAccepted version880.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.