Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/18942

Title: Different paths to consensus? The impact of need for closure on model-supported group conflict management
Authors: Franco, L. Alberto
Rouwette, Etienne A.J.A.
Korzilius, Hubert
Keywords: Behavioural OR
Need for closure
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: © Elsevier
Citation: FRANCO, L.A., ROUWETTE, E.A.J.A. and KORZILIUS, H., 2016. Different paths to consensus? The impact of need for closure on model-supported group conflict management. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(3), pp.878-889.
Abstract: Empirical evidence on how cognitive factors impact the effectiveness of model-supported group decision making is lacking. This study reports on an experiment on the effects of need for closure, defined as a desire for definite knowledge on some issue and the eschewal of ambiguity. The study was conducted with over 40 postgraduate student groups. A quantitative analysis shows that compared to groups low in need for closure, groups high in need for closure experienced less conflict when using Value-Focused Thinking to make a budget allocation decision. Furthermore, low need for closure groups used the model to surface conflict and engaged in open discussions to come to an agreement. By contrast, high need for closure groups suppressed conflict and used the model to put boundaries on the discussion. Interestingly, both groups achieve similar levels of consensus, and high need for closure groups are more satisfied than low need for closure groups. A qualitative analysis of a subset of groups reveals that in high need for closure groups only a few participants control the model building process, and final decisions are not based on the model but on simpler tools. The findings highlight the need to account for the effects of cognitive factors when designing and deploying model-based support for practical interventions.
Description: This paper is closed access until 2nd July 2017.
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.056
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/18942
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.056
ISSN: 0377-2217
Appears in Collections:Closed Access (Business School)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Francoetal2015accept.pdfAccepted version307.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.