Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/18994

Title: Securing and scaling resilient futures: neoliberalization, infrastructure, and topologies of power
Authors: Sage, Daniel J.
Fussey, Pete
Dainty, Andrew R.J.
Keywords: Resilience
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: © SAGE Publications Ltd.
Citation: SAGE, D., FUSSEY, P. and DAINTY, A., 2015. Securing and scaling resilient futures: neoliberalization, infrastructure, and topologies of power. Environment and Planning D - Society & Space, 33 (3), pp.494-511
Abstract: In this paper we explore the scaling of resilience policy and practice not as an effect upon infrastructure but as enacted through infrastructure. Drawing on Foucault’s topological analyses of governmental power, especially his elaboration of its coeval centripetal and centrifugal flows, we argue that understanding the scaling of resilience policy and practice involves acknowledging its infrastructural composition. We examine this infrastructural scaling through an empirical analysis of UK resilience policy and practice, as recounted by those working across multiple organizations involved in planning for, and coping with, aleatory events. This reveals how the neoliberal decentralizing refrain, expressed in resilience policy and its critique, is both sustained and displaced by interwoven circulatory mechanisms of obstruction, filtration, and acceleration. Together these infrastructural flows amount to ‘fractionally coherent’ scalings that not only centralize governmental power but are constitutive of governmental centres. Our analyses of infrastructural scaling suggest that resiliency policy and practice is far less decentralized, or localized, than others have suggested, with both centripetal and centrifugal flows of power resulting from a composite of infrastructural circulatory mechanisms that can variously scale political agency in relation to aleatory events.
Description: This article was published in the journal, Environment and Planning D - Society & Space [© SAGE Publications]. The definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/d14154p
Sponsor: This paper was based upon research conducted within the EPSRC-ESRC funded research project ‘Resilient Futures’ (EP/I005943/1).
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1068/d14154p
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/18994
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/d14154p
ISSN: 0263-7758
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
'Resilience to what where and for whom' reduced+AD.pdfAccepted version240.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.