Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/19094

Title: How to reduce sitting time? A review of behaviour change strategies used in sedentary behaviour reduction interventions among adults
Authors: Gardner, Benjamin
Smith, Lee
Lorencatto, Fabiana
Hamer, Mark
Biddle, Stuart J.H.
Keywords: Sedentary behaviour
Behaviour change
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: © 2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis
Citation: GARDNER, B. ...et al., 2015. How to reduce sitting time? A review of behaviour change strategies used in sedentary behaviour reduction interventions among adults. Health Psychology Review.
Abstract: Sedentary behaviour – i.e., low energy-expending waking behaviour while seated or lying down – is a health risk factor, even when controlling for physical activity. This review sought to describe the behaviour change strategies used within interventions that have sought to reduce sedentary behaviour in adults. Studies were identified through existing literature reviews, a systematic database search, and handsearches of eligible papers. Interventions were categorised as ‘very promising’, ‘quite promising’, or ‘non-promising’ according to observed behaviour changes. Intervention functions and behaviour change techniques were compared across promising and non-promising interventions. Twenty-six eligible studies reported thirty-eight interventions, of which twenty (53%) were worksite-based. Fifteen interventions (39%) were very promising, eight quite promising (21%), and fifteen non-promising (39%). Very or quite promising interventions tended to have targeted sedentary behaviour instead of physical activity. Interventions based on environmental restructuring, persuasion, or education were most promising. Self-monitoring, problem solving, and restructuring the social or physical environment were particularly promising behaviour change techniques. Future sedentary reduction interventions might most fruitfully incorporate environmental modification and self-regulatory skills training. The evidence base is, however, weakened by low-quality evaluation methods; more RCTs, employing no-treatment control groups, and collecting objective data are needed.
Description: This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Taylor and Francis under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported Licence (CC BY). Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Sponsor: This project was supported by a grant from the National Prevention Research Initiative (MR/J000396/2; see http://www.mrc.ac.uk/research/initiatives/national-prevention-researchinitiative-npri/).
Version: Published
DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1082146
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/19094
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2015.1082146
ISSN: 1743-7199
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
gardiner_hamer.pdfPublished version622.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.