Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/19097

Title: A morphometric comparison of the Namib and southwest Kalahari dunefields using ASTER GDEM data
Authors: White, Kevin
Bullard, Joanna E.
Livingstone, Ian
Moran, Lisa
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: © Elsevier
Citation: WHITE, K. ...et al., 2015. A morphometric comparison of the Namib and southwest Kalahari dunefields using ASTER GDEM data. Aeolian Research, 19, ptA, pp.87-95.
Abstract: The increased availability of digital elevation models and satellite image data enable testing of morphometric relationships between sand dune variables (dune height, spacing and equivalent sand thickness), which were originally established using limited field survey data. These long-established geomorphological hypotheses can now be tested against very much larger samples than were possible when available data were limited to what could be collected by field surveys alone. This project uses ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM) data to compare morphometric relationships between sand dune variables in the southwest Kalahari dunefield to those of the Namib Sand Sea, to test whether the relationships found in an active sand sea (Namib) also hold for the fixed dune system of the nearby southwest Kalahari. The data show significant morphometric differences between the simple linear dunes of the Namib sand sea and the southwest Kalahari; the latter do not show the expected positive relationship between dune height and spacing. The southwest Kalahari dunes show a similar range of dune spacings, but they are less tall, on average, than the Namib sand sea dunes. There is a clear spatial pattern to these morphometric data; the tallest and most closely spaced dunes are towards the southeast of the Kalahari dunefield; and this is where the highest values of equivalent sand thickness result. We consider the possible reasons for the observed differences and highlight the need for more studies comparing sand seas and dunefields from different environmental settings.
Description: This paper is in closed access until 26th Oct 2016.
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2015.09.006
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/19097
Publisher Link: http:dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2015.09.006
ISSN: 1875-9637
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Geography and Environment)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
white_bullard.pdfAccepted version726.1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.